<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for robscherer.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robscherer.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robscherer.com</link>
	<description>User Experience and Stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Usability Testing and its Effect on Creativity by Claudius</title>
		<link>http://robscherer.com/2007/02/21/usability-testing-and-its-effect-on-creativity/#comment-5458</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 05:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robscherer.com/?p=17#comment-5458</guid>
		<description>The people in such cases, said so - Avos will be alive, maybe pomrem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The people in such cases, said so - Avos will be alive, maybe pomrem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Brand Or User Experience? by Rob Scherer</title>
		<link>http://robscherer.com/2008/03/27/brand-or-user-experience/#comment-2439</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Scherer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 23:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robscherer.com/2008/03/27/brand-or-user-experience/#comment-2439</guid>
		<description>Hi Jessica,

Thanks for your comments. I agree that mixing green and blue might be a nice balance of colour association and brand. Green is definately a go/good/available colour. I don't like the pink because of its association with stop/error/you're bad.

With regard to your question - yes, there are 3 distinct states:

Available = green or pink
Mine = yellow or blue
Unavailable = grey

I'll have a look at green/blue to see how it sits with the design.

Cheers
Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jessica,</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments. I agree that mixing green and blue might be a nice balance of colour association and brand. Green is definately a go/good/available colour. I don&#8217;t like the pink because of its association with stop/error/you&#8217;re bad.</p>
<p>With regard to your question - yes, there are 3 distinct states:</p>
<p>Available = green or pink<br />
Mine = yellow or blue<br />
Unavailable = grey</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have a look at green/blue to see how it sits with the design.</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Brand Or User Experience? by Jessica Enders</title>
		<link>http://robscherer.com/2008/03/27/brand-or-user-experience/#comment-2428</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica Enders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 06:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robscherer.com/2008/03/27/brand-or-user-experience/#comment-2428</guid>
		<description>Hi Rob

This is a good question. So much so that I'm going to respond with a question. :-)

In your context, is the "available/unavailable" irrelevant if the object is "mine"? If so, I would  make status a toggle /between/ the former and the latter. 

In terms of colours, how about something a little different:

- Available = green
- Unavailable = grey
- Mine = blue (brand version)

My reasoning for the colours is as follows. Green is associated (in our culture, at least) with good, go, etc. Grey is the standard for unavailable things (e.g. links) on the Web. 

For "mine", I stayed away from yellow because it's too traffic-light-like (green, yellow, red) and may suggest more "maybe" than "mine". I also wouldn't choose your corporate pink because it is so strongly associated with your brand that it might suggest "not mine but yours". Also pink and green could pose problems for people with red/green colour blindness (the most common type). Blue, on the other hand, contrasts nicely with green (depending on the hues, of course) while still being a corporate colour.

I wouldn't use just pink, blue and grey because pink and blue /both/ don't have a strong place in a user's mental model other than association with your company. Giving them green gives them at least one handle with something they are familiar with. And if you want users to buy things that are available, then green is a nice reinforcing colour.

Hope this helps. Would be a good question for IxDA: http://ixda.org/.

Cheers,
Jessica</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rob</p>
<p>This is a good question. So much so that I&#8217;m going to respond with a question. <img src='http://robscherer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
In your context, is the &#8220;available/unavailable&#8221; irrelevant if the object is &#8220;mine&#8221;? If so, I would  make status a toggle /between/ the former and the latter. </p>
<p>In terms of colours, how about something a little different:</p>
<p>- Available = green<br />
- Unavailable = grey<br />
- Mine = blue (brand version)</p>
<p>My reasoning for the colours is as follows. Green is associated (in our culture, at least) with good, go, etc. Grey is the standard for unavailable things (e.g. links) on the Web. </p>
<p>For &#8220;mine&#8221;, I stayed away from yellow because it&#8217;s too traffic-light-like (green, yellow, red) and may suggest more &#8220;maybe&#8221; than &#8220;mine&#8221;. I also wouldn&#8217;t choose your corporate pink because it is so strongly associated with your brand that it might suggest &#8220;not mine but yours&#8221;. Also pink and green could pose problems for people with red/green colour blindness (the most common type). Blue, on the other hand, contrasts nicely with green (depending on the hues, of course) while still being a corporate colour.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t use just pink, blue and grey because pink and blue /both/ don&#8217;t have a strong place in a user&#8217;s mental model other than association with your company. Giving them green gives them at least one handle with something they are familiar with. And if you want users to buy things that are available, then green is a nice reinforcing colour.</p>
<p>Hope this helps. Would be a good question for IxDA: <a href="http://ixda.org/" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/ixda.org');">http://ixda.org/</a>.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Jessica</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Will Buy Apple by Musings on User Experience - Google and Apple Working Well Together at robscherer.com</title>
		<link>http://robscherer.com/2007/05/18/google-will-buy-apple/#comment-1063</link>
		<dc:creator>Musings on User Experience - Google and Apple Working Well Together at robscherer.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 04:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robscherer.com/2007/05/18/google-will-buy-apple/#comment-1063</guid>
		<description>[...] writes that iMovie now comes with really tight integration with YouTube. Remember my AppleGoo post? Still on the cards? Me thinks [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] writes that iMovie now comes with really tight integration with YouTube. Remember my AppleGoo post? Still on the cards? Me thinks [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Usability Testing and its Effect on Creativity by Rob Scherer</title>
		<link>http://robscherer.com/2007/02/21/usability-testing-and-its-effect-on-creativity/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Scherer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robscherer.com/?p=17#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Hi Lisa,

Nice to hear from you. I must say, I tried really hard to work out your stance on the usability vs creativity issue from your post. Your comment "So I guess I have to sit on the fence for this one" led me to believe that you didn't have a stance one way or the other. I admit that 'assert' was not correct word. Perhaps 'questions' is better?

Cheers
Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Lisa,</p>
<p>Nice to hear from you. I must say, I tried really hard to work out your stance on the usability vs creativity issue from your post. Your comment &#8220;So I guess I have to sit on the fence for this one&#8221; led me to believe that you didn&#8217;t have a stance one way or the other. I admit that &#8216;assert&#8217; was not correct word. Perhaps &#8216;questions&#8217; is better?</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Usability Testing and its Effect on Creativity by lisa herrod</title>
		<link>http://robscherer.com/2007/02/21/usability-testing-and-its-effect-on-creativity/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>lisa herrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 08:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robscherer.com/?p=17#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Hi Rob,

I just want to clarify that I did not and do not "assert" that usability stifles creativity. As a usability consultant, I would be mad to think so. The title of the post is merely reflecting the thoughts of some designers and developers I have spoken with.

Cheers,

Lisa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rob,</p>
<p>I just want to clarify that I did not and do not &#8220;assert&#8221; that usability stifles creativity. As a usability consultant, I would be mad to think so. The title of the post is merely reflecting the thoughts of some designers and developers I have spoken with.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Lisa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Death Threats Against Kathy Sierra by Thought Leadership</title>
		<link>http://robscherer.com/2007/03/27/death-threats-against-kathy-sierra/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Thought Leadership</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 11:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robscherer.com/2007/03/27/death-threats-against-kathy-sierra/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Kathy Sierra and Ethics...&lt;/strong&gt;

Once again, most bloggers got it twisted when it comes to Kathy Sierra. Maybe they need an alternative perspective......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Kathy Sierra and Ethics&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Once again, most bloggers got it twisted when it comes to Kathy Sierra. Maybe they need an alternative perspective&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Photoshop. Coming Soon to a Browser Near You. by Musings on User Experience - HTML is the new API at robscherer.com</title>
		<link>http://robscherer.com/2007/03/01/photoshop-coming-soon-to-a-browser-near-you/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Musings on User Experience - HTML is the new API at robscherer.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 00:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robscherer.com/2007/03/01/photoshop-coming-soon-to-a-browser-near-you/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>[...] on from my recent post about Photoshop moving online, I read this great post on Joel Spolsky&#8217;s site. Joel asserts that the new API is HTML and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on from my recent post about Photoshop moving online, I read this great post on Joel Spolsky&#8217;s site. Joel asserts that the new API is HTML and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Photoshop. Coming Soon to a Browser Near You. by Rob Scherer</title>
		<link>http://robscherer.com/2007/03/01/photoshop-coming-soon-to-a-browser-near-you/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Scherer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 01:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robscherer.com/2007/03/01/photoshop-coming-soon-to-a-browser-near-you/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Fredrik. You make a good point and yes, I like phixr and pxn8. But, the point I was trying to make was that I believe rich web interfaces will continue to mimick and ultimately replace shrink wrapped software. The efficiencies of the rich web interface will continue to increase until shrink wrapped can no longer compete ragardless of the technology (Ajax, Flash, Flex) being used to manage the client/server relationship. Some verticals will adopt earlier and others later, but the days of software being installed on PC's are numbered (it may take decades but the progression is logical).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fredrik. You make a good point and yes, I like phixr and pxn8. But, the point I was trying to make was that I believe rich web interfaces will continue to mimick and ultimately replace shrink wrapped software. The efficiencies of the rich web interface will continue to increase until shrink wrapped can no longer compete ragardless of the technology (Ajax, Flash, Flex) being used to manage the client/server relationship. Some verticals will adopt earlier and others later, but the days of software being installed on PC&#8217;s are numbered (it may take decades but the progression is logical).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Photoshop. Coming Soon to a Browser Near You. by Fredrik</title>
		<link>http://robscherer.com/2007/03/01/photoshop-coming-soon-to-a-browser-near-you/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Fredrik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 10:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robscherer.com/2007/03/01/photoshop-coming-soon-to-a-browser-near-you/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Since when are flash/flex apps "cool"? Since it's executed on your machine, you could as well install a desktop app. 

Real online apps, like http://www.phixr.com or http://pxn8.com really run on the server, and work on stripped down machines without flex/flash and without java.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since when are flash/flex apps &#8220;cool&#8221;? Since it&#8217;s executed on your machine, you could as well install a desktop app. </p>
<p>Real online apps, like <a href="http://www.phixr.com" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.phixr.com');">http://www.phixr.com</a> or <a href="http://pxn8.com" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/pxn8.com');">http://pxn8.com</a> really run on the server, and work on stripped down machines without flex/flash and without java.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
