Archive for the 'web 3.0' Category

18
May

Google Will Buy Apple

iGoogle doesn’t make sense. Why would Google decide to name their personalised homepage iGoogle? My Google makes a lot more sense in a world where “My” is the ubiquitous metaphor websites use to indicate the users’ personal account area.

The “i” is ‘owned’ by Apple and has been used by Apple to identify and brand their products since the first iMac in 1998. Recently we have seen the patent dispute over the iPhone name, which Apple fought vigorously for. While I am not suggesting that Apple should, could or will take legal action against Google, it strikes me as peculiar that Google would blatantly go and name something ‘i’+x.

So, is Google cashing in on the popularity of Apple’s ‘i’ products and hoping that they will get more adoption of their personalised homepage as a result? I don’t see why they would want or need to as they have always led and been innovators (or purchasers) rather than jumping on someone else’s successful bandwagon.

Further, it is well known that Eric Schmidt sits on Apple’s board. What better way to innocuously observe the hunt before going in for the kill.

I think a Google purchase of Apple makes a lot of sense. Google’s mission is to “organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful.” Apple is all about design and the benefit that people get from using well designed products. Imagine the world’s information beautifully organised and elegantly designed.

Google’s and Apple’s (AppleGoo) biggest competitor is Microsoft. Advertising, software and operating systems are the markets. Together as one, AppleGoo would be able to combine and focus their efforts on eliminating the enemy in all markets in which they operate. Apple are currently doing a superb job of developing superior operating systems, music players and software and phones are coming. Google is playing with phones too, is killing Microsoft in search and is developing great web based software to rival Office.

Apple’s market cap is currently about $95 billion. Google has that in the bank.

So, it makes sense to me, how about you? I hope that if this does happen, the first thing Apple does is apply their design to a revised iGoogle logo!

20
Feb

Web 2.0 is, like, sooooo 2007!

Read/WriteWeb has an interesting article theorising that Web 3.0 will be the product of the following formula:

Web 3.0 = (4C + P + VS).

4C = Content, Commerce, Community, Context | P = Personalization | VS = Vertical Search

I tend to agree. Commerce and content have been the drivers of the internet for many years. Community is very 2.0, as is personalisation. Add context and vertical search and I think you’ll start to see a whole new generation of sites emerging.

It is a logical evolution. As the generalist 2.0 sites become so large, there will be a market need for more specialised and contextual information management and deliver.

Web 2.0 has just completed its Bachelor of Medicine. Let’s see what type of specialists the graduates go on to become.




November 2008
M T W T F S S
« Jul    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

flickr Photos

  • Dr Superman
  • IMG_5110
  • IMG_5095
  • IMG_5106