<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>robscherer.com &#187; usability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robscherer.com/category/usability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robscherer.com</link>
	<description>User Experience and Stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:39:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>What Would this Mean to a Pensioner?</title>
		<link>http://robscherer.com/2009/10/15/what-would-this-mean-to-a-pensioner/</link>
		<comments>http://robscherer.com/2009/10/15/what-would-this-mean-to-a-pensioner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Scherer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[copy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robscherer.com/?p=95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m currently taking care of an insurance claim for my in-laws and received an email from their insurer, Australian Pensioner&#8217;s Insurance Agency (APIA). This disclaimer made no sense to me, so I wonder what a pensioner would make of it. No wonder they are so scared of technology.
&#8220;The following message has been automatically added by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m currently taking care of an insurance claim for my in-laws and received an email from their insurer, Australian Pensioner&#8217;s Insurance Agency (APIA). This disclaimer made no sense to me, so I wonder what a pensioner would make of it. No wonder they are so scared of technology.</p>
<p>&#8220;The following message has been automatically added by the Internet mail gateway to comply with the Group&#8217;s Information Security requirements.</p>
<p>&#8220;This e-mail has arrived via the Internet, and therefore you should be cautious about its origin and content. Replies which contain sensitive information and / or legal/contractual obligations are particularly vulnerable.</p>
<p>In these cases you should not reply unless you are authorised to do so, and adequate encryption is employed.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you have any questions, please contact the IS Service Desk.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robscherer.com/2009/10/15/what-would-this-mean-to-a-pensioner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t Stop Password Masking</title>
		<link>http://robscherer.com/2009/06/26/dont-stop-masking-passwords/</link>
		<comments>http://robscherer.com/2009/06/26/dont-stop-masking-passwords/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Scherer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user experience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robscherer.com/?p=89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In his Alertbox this week, Jakob Nielsen tells us to Stop Password Masking. He says &#8220;It&#8217;s time to show most passwords in clear text as users type them&#8221;.  It&#8217;s not something that I&#8217;ve ever thought of and I like the thinking but I don&#8217;t agree with it.
Jakob bases his rationale on the fact that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his Alertbox this week, Jakob Nielsen tells us to <a href="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/passwords.html">Stop Password Masking</a>. He says &#8220;It&#8217;s time to show most passwords in clear text as users type them&#8221;.  It&#8217;s not something that I&#8217;ve ever thought of and I like the thinking but I don&#8217;t agree with it.</p>
<p>Jakob bases his rationale on the fact that there is <strong>usually</strong> nobody looking over your shoulder when you log in so masking the password is only serves to increase the chance of user error. But what about the times when somebody <strong>is</strong> looking over your shoulder. What do you do then? Jakob says that you should add a checkbox to your login form so that people can choose whether to mask their password. I think this adds unnecessary weight to the login form &#8211; another thing for the user to consider when logging in.</p>
<p>What about the registration form? There&#8217;s usually nobody peering over your shoulder when you&#8217;re registering so it seems like a more reasonable place to display passwords in clear text. By doing so you could remove the need for the retype password field but I wonder how much of the username + password + retype password  pattern users look for when scanning a registration page (that often also contains a login box).</p>
<p>It seems that Jakob&#8217;s thinking is based on things he&#8217;s observed while testing mobile devices. I agree that typing passwords on a mobile device can be tricky because of the small format keyboard but I wonder if it isn&#8217;t the responsibility of the operating system or hardware to solve that particular problem. The iPhone does a great job of both masking and displaying a password &#8211; but that&#8217;s done on the phone, not the website.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a tricky one but the fact that I&#8217;ve never thought of it as a problem and have never observed or read about anyone actually complaining about it leads me to conclude that it ain&#8217;t broke so let&#8217;s not fix it.</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robscherer.com/2009/06/26/dont-stop-masking-passwords/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
