<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>robscherer.com &#187; digg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robscherer.com/category/digg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robscherer.com</link>
	<description>User Experience and Stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:39:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Digg Users are Revolting</title>
		<link>http://robscherer.com/2007/05/02/digg-users-are-revolting/</link>
		<comments>http://robscherer.com/2007/05/02/digg-users-are-revolting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 04:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Scherer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robscherer.com/2007/05/02/digg-users-are-revolting/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amazing events on Digg today with users up in arms over Digg removing a post linking to those numbers (09-F9-11-02-9D-74-E3-5B-D8-41-56-C5-63-56-88-C0) that the MPAA don&#8217;t want us to see. All activity on the front page of Digg is around posts linking to the #.
I find it amazing that Digg would even try to censor something that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://robscherer.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/1.gif' title='Digg front page 1 May 2007'><img src='http://robscherer.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/1.thumbnail.gif' style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;" alt='Digg front page 1 May 2007' /></a>Amazing events on Digg today with users up in arms over Digg removing a post linking to those numbers (09-F9-11-02-9D-74-E3-5B-D8-41-56-C5-63-56-88-C0) that the MPAA don&#8217;t want us to see. All activity on the front page of Digg is around posts linking to the #.</p>
<p>I find it amazing that Digg would even try to censor something that is:</p>
<ol>
<li>In the public domain</li>
<li>So close to the hearts of its community (MPAA bashing)</li>
</ol>
<p>I don&#8217;t think this will have any long term effect on Digg, it will return to normal over the next couple of weeks (yes, I think it will take a little while to settle down) but I think it will have an enormous impact on Web 2.0, user generated and the legal responsibility of a service provider to moderate, control and govern its users.</p>
<p>A lot of organisations will now think twice before giving users as much power as they have been given by the first wave of user generated sites. </p>
<p>Things will change. Web 2.0 has just grown up.</p>
<p>Viva la revolution!</p>
<p>Update: <a href="http://blog.digg.com/?p=74">Digg have given up</a> moderating and have decided to go down fighting. I think that may be the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robscherer.com/2007/05/02/digg-users-are-revolting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t Copy Us. We&#8217;ll Copy You.</title>
		<link>http://robscherer.com/2007/02/16/dont-copy-us-well-copy-you/</link>
		<comments>http://robscherer.com/2007/02/16/dont-copy-us-well-copy-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 23:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Scherer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Yahoo!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robscherer.com/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While we&#8217;re on Yahoo!, I thought that the current storm over Yahoo Suggestions was quite humerous. Here I am posting about Yahoo! patents one minute and then posting about Yahoo copying Digg the next.
Frankly, I don&#8217;t see what all the fuss is about. The screenshots below show the similarities between Yahoo Suggestions and Digg, with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While we&#8217;re on Yahoo!, I thought that the current storm over <a href="http://suggestions.yahoo.com/" title="http://suggestions.yahoo.com/" target="_blank">Yahoo Suggestions</a> was quite humerous. Here I am posting about Yahoo! patents one minute and then posting about Yahoo copying Digg the next.</p>
<p>Frankly, I don&#8217;t see what all the fuss is about. The screenshots below show the similarities between Yahoo Suggestions and Digg, with voting for stories to the left of the short blurb. All looks very similar.</p>
<p><strong>Yahoo:</strong><br />
<img src="http://scherer.wordpress.com/files/2007/02/yahoo.gif" alt="Yahoo Suggestions" height="292" width="486" /><br />
<strong>Digg:</strong><br />
<img src="http://scherer.wordpress.com/files/2007/02/digg.gif" alt="Digg" height="266" width="457" /><br />
No doubt, Digg created a great system and UI for user generated and rated content. It is a given then, that others will &#8220;copy&#8221; it. There is absolutely nothing wrong with &#8220;reapply with pride&#8221;. Yahoo! even went so far as to <a href="http://yodel.yahoo.com/2007/02/14/it-takes-two-to-tango/" title="http://yodel.yahoo.com/2007/02/14/it-takes-two-to-tango/" target="_blank">credit Digg on it&#8217;s blog</a> so I can&#8217;t see what all of the fuss is about.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with Yahoo! on this one, can&#8217;t see what all of the fuss is about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://robscherer.com/2007/02/16/dont-copy-us-well-copy-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
